The court ruled that the Dutch government must cut emissions by at least 25% compared with 1990 levels by the end of 2020 "because of the risk of a risky climate change that can also seriously affect the residents of the Netherlands in their right to life and well-being", according to a translation from BuzzFeed News.
In technical terms, the Supreme Court's decision will force the authorities to take strong action to achieve the 25 percentage decrease, which might include closing coal-fired power plants, a few of which started as recently as 2016.
It was a victory for the environmental group Urgenda, which filed its lawsuit in 2013 against the Dutch government with almost 900 co-plaintiffs.
The Dutch High Court on Friday ordered the government to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 25% below 1990 levels by the end of next year in a ruling that could have repercussions around the world.
The court said the government had not done enough to protect its citizens from the unsafe effects of climate change, which can "threaten their lives and wellbeing". Those efforts, however, have set off repeated protests by farmers and construction workers against government efforts to cut emissions, saying that has hurt their jobs. A federal swimsuit on behalf of younger people expects trial in OR following a labyrinthine route of pretrial filings and appeals which have attained the Supreme Court docket two.
"Our country is to a large extent below sea level, so at a certain point in time if it goes as quickly as it goes right now, you might have a serious problem here", she said.
Urgenda is a portmanteau word, a combination of "urgent" and "agenda".
The Dutch government appealed against that decision and in October 2018, the Hague Court of Appeal ruled for Urgenda and said that the government had violated its obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. A federal suit on behalf of young people awaits trial in OR after a labyrinthine path of pretrial filings and appeals that have reached the Supreme Court twice already. The team sponsoring that suit, Our Children's Trust, has also established state-level suits across the USA. Environmental Safety Company, the Supreme Court docket affirmed the nation's argument that the Clear Air Act enabled the federal government to regulate greenhouse gases.
Michael Gerrard, manager of the Sabin Center for Law at Columbia University Law School, stated in an email:"You've been 1,442 climate lawsuits across the world".
World governmental exercise on local weather change has misplaced momentum as a result of the 2015 Paris local weather association was reached.
One of the plaintiffs in the case, Damian Rau, was 12 years old when the case was first filed.